Wednesday, 31 May 2017

Week 3 – Shakespeare’s London and Elizabethan Audiences

What was London like in Elizabethan times and who were the people attending the theatre?



London


London was a very big city, but that wasn’t all. It was growing very rapidly, and this was due to the migration of people from the countryside and from other countries in Europe. Between 1550 and 1600, it was estimated that London city grew from around 50,000 residents to over 200,000.  Inside the medieval walls of the city, where there was available space, it was being built on, and outside, the suburbs grew steadily into the countryside. London was a very overcrowded city and in 1599, a Swiss visitor said, “one simply cannot walk along the streets for the crowds”. Another visitor called the crowded streets “dark and narrow”. The darkness attracted thieves, and the overcrowding easily brought and spread diseases.  The plague tended to strike most summers, and in 1593, about 10,000 people were killed along with all the theatres closing. In 1607, John Donne called it “London, plaguey London, full of danger and vice”.

London was the biggest and richest city in England, and was the home of the first permanent playhouses too. London was very dirty, noisy, crowded and it was always teeming with people. The changes in the agriculture during the Elizabethan period led to people leaving the countryside, and their village lives, to search for employment and other working opportunities in towns like London. Every type of Elizabethan trade could be found in the city of London. The city was a great commercial centre of England and was home of the famous London Guilds. Housing in London was mainly apartment buildings all crammed together in odd arrangements. There were no drainage or sewage, so this meant that whatever someone may have stepped in whilst walking down the street, is what someone else probably once ate. Chamber pot faeces were thrown out of windows and onto the people below. Common London street festivities consisted of getting drunk at alehouses, bear baiting, gambling dens, and brothels. All of these festivities weren’t even frowned upon.
One of London's Streets

London Bridge wasn’t the only way to cross the Thames. People who were in a rush, or had money, could pay to cross the river by boats called ‘water taxis’. Back then, there used to be 3,000 water taxis available for use along the Thames. Coaches were popular back then and that is how quite a few people travelled to get around. However, the only thing was that they were expensive so there was no doubt that only the wealthy-enough were able to pay for them. A new coach could be bought for £34, and a second-hand coach could be bought for £8. These prices alone didn’t even include the pricing for a team or four or six horses and food to provide for them, so that made sense as to why mainly the wealthy used coaches and could afford them comfortably. As well as using the horses for pulling the coaches, they were also used individually as another mode of transport which was most popular, quickest, and easiest way of travelling.

There were loads of common crimes in London. These included; begging and unemployment, witchcraft, heresy, thievery and murder. Anyone who was not employed by a master was considered illegal in the eyes of the law. Even travelling merchants, tinkers, palm readers and other self-employed workers could be sentenced to whipping or some other form of physical torture. A great movement began in Europe in the mid-1600’s that encouraged witch hunting. Convicted witches could be banished, hanged or burned. If someone didn’t agree or submit to the beliefs of the Church of England, they faced severe sentences. King Henry VIII changing the religion of England was extremely controversial. It bothered many people that England had broken away from the Catholic Church. However, going against this reformation was punishable by death. It was illegal to steal another man’s property, and the killing of another man was a terrible violation of the law. Some of the torturing punishment for these crimes included; The Pillory, The Iron Boot, The Scavenger’s Daughter, The Iron Maiden, The Gossip’s Bridle (Brank), The Rack, The Bastinado, and The Jougs.
One of London's Markets

Audiences


Nearly everyone in the London society went to the theatre, although they were generally more men than women. In 1617, someone once described the audience as ‘a gang of porters and carters’. Some other people said that servants and apprentices spent all of their spare time there. However, the wealthier people went to the theatres too. In 1607, the Venetian ambassador bought all the most expensive seats for one of Shakespeare’s plays Pericles.

In open air theatres, the cheapest price was only 1 penny. This bought you a place amongst the ‘groundlings’ standing in the ‘yard’ around the stage. There used to be 240 pennies in one pound. For another penny, you could have a bench seat in the lower galleries which surrounded the yard. For a few pennies more, you could sit quite comfortably on a cushion. The most expensive seats however, would have been in the ‘Lord’s Rooms’. Admission into the indoor theatres started at six pence, and in comparison, one penny was only the price of a loaf of bread. The low cost of the theatre was one reason as to why the theatres were so popular.

Wealthy trades and manufacturers – and their workers – lived there. They were the people able to go to the theatre. By 1600, the number of people that went to theatres in London was 20,000 per week. London was evidently also home to royalty and much of the nobility. Rich noblemen became patrons of theatre companies, and gave financial and legal support. Royalty also supported the theatre and they loved watching plays. They didn’t go to the public theatres, but companies of actors were summoned to perform at the courts of Elizabeth I and James I.
Elizabethan Audience

From 1603 to 1613, Shakespeare’s company played at the court of King James about 15 times per year. The groundlings were very close to the action on the stage and the audience were also able to buy food and drink whilst the performance is going on. They could get pippins (apples), oranges, nuts, gingerbread and ale. There were no toilets, and the floor that they stood on as probably just sand, ash or they were covered in nutshells. Some people complained saying that the pit smelled of garlic and beer and no good citizen would go and show their face there.

The behaviour of the audience in theatres can be in some ways resonant with young people nowadays in conjunction to specific things. For example, some people only went to the theatre back then to be seen and admired and even dressed in the best clothes. But those people were not necessarily well behaved. That is like quite a few of young people in this modern day and age. We could even go to a corner shop dressed in pure designer and jewellery in case we see someone that we would possibly like to ‘impress’. Most of the audience in the Elizabethan era didn’t sit down and watch the performances in silence like we do today. They used to clap at the heroes, boo at the villains, and cheer for the special effects. Sometimes, fights would break out due to thieving within the audience.

In 1612, magistrates banned music at the end of plays at the Fortune, because they said that the crowds had caused ‘tumults and outrages’ with their dances. Due to the fact that the audiences were really large, most plays only had short runs and then were replaced. Between 1560 and 1640, about 3,000 new plays were written. To attract the crowds of dramatism, the plays often re-told old famous stories that people knew from the past, and in order to keep people’s attention, they used violence, music and humour in the plays to keep them interested. This was vital as you could tell when an audience member didn’t like a play. For instance, at the Swan in 1602, the audience damaged the chairs, stools, curtains and the walls. In 1629, a French company came over to visit and when they performed, they were hissed and ‘pippin-pelted’ from the stage because they used female actors to play the female roles, and this is something that the audience were really outraged about. And so since then, based on the major involvements of the audiences in the performance of the plays, it was vital that the plays were a success to prevent these situations from occurring again.

No comments:

Post a Comment